YingHo 發表於 2013-8-19 09:38
靜睇後面幾張相，M240既立體感又好過M9
M240 have better contrast. also the higher resolution will help with showing the texture.. I feel the metal more like metal in M240 pics.
If the pics are on par, I will get the M240 just for the ISO performance. But in reality, I do like the movie mode a lot!! Especially if you have kid.
Furthermore, I really dislike the low res LCD on M9. Since day one.
Personally I want M240 win because have one silver chrome coming and it give me an excuse to replace my M9
frankly i can't tell which was taken with which from the attached photos.
i'm totally with Panda on the ISO performance - i'd like to have a digital M i can shoot in low light environment.
本帖最後由 C9.99 於 2013-8-19 13:46 編輯
白忙了半天, 發現原來就算用kelvin手動白平衡, M240與M9出來的色溫差距相差近千K, 用自動亦當然有差別, 最後選取了場景模式daylight, 差別較小! 但如在這個大晴天下, M9的WB應該更接近實際環境. M240偏黃了少許.
By M240, 八妹@f/2.8, iso200
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7337/9542181953_4176266e62_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 image
By M9, 八妹@f/2.8, iso200
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7312/9542199425_e90622001d_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 image
By M240, 八妹@f/8
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2819/9544939474_b4a3b1c3c4_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 橫浜
By M9, 八妹@f/8
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7443/9542166257_0c4a21baa3_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 橫浜
By M240 with C-Summicron 40mm f/2
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3804/9545093984_2088afaa42_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 image
By M9 with C-Summicron 40mm f/2
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5523/9542343039_91f6a57575_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 image
本帖最後由 Pandachief 於 2013-8-19 17:40 編輯
The red/orange/yellow is slightly stronger on M240. If one prefer the colour tone of M9, we can try reduce those colour in PP.The M240 in general is warmer especially when compare to M9. I wish they can have that adjusted in coming firmware (There's rumours in RF forum saying that this will be addressed in coming firmware).
The default contrast is higher too! No matter jpeg or raw! Take advantage of the better dynamic. Actually, Most M240 pics require less PP than M9.
快門一樣？點解M9全部光1/3 to 1/2級？
actually on my monitor, the WB of M240 looks perfect. and M9 samples look a bit bluish!
本帖最後由 C9.99 於 2013-8-19 18:46 編輯
grandetech 發表於 2013-8-19 16:16
快門一樣？點解M9全部光1/3 to 1/2級？
同一光圈快門iso,但M9係会光小小, 我都唔知點解
M9 images look overexposed??
本帖最後由 C9.99 於 2013-8-19 18:39 編輯
By M240, with C-Summicron 40mm f/2 @f/2, iso1000, 1/360
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7449/9546021088_2f91da9af8_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 美登利
By M9, 同樣 @f/2, iso1000, 1/360
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2819/9546021196_cd0648cf4a_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 image
本帖最後由 Pandachief 於 2013-8-19 17:42 編輯
Jason 發表於 2013-8-19 16:22
actually on my monitor, the WB of M240 looks perfect. and M9 samples look a bit bluish!
Sometime the warmer tone is more welcome especially skin tone!M9 is more "cool"... somewhere in between will be perfect! {:4_132:}
By M240, 8elements
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2873/9543280805_f33d641359_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 image
By M9, 8elements
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3789/9543280925_9881e77e12_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 image
本帖最後由 C9.99 於 2013-8-19 19:13 編輯
下面試下M9打快半級快門, 再睇睇相差如何, iso一樣係1000, M9暗番少少, 即兩者相差少於半級但接近光!
By M240, 1/180sec
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2805/9546381436_9ae4c5eeb7_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 image
By M9, 1/250sec
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5349/9546381540_fe877eb41b_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 1/250sec, by M9
M240 seems more pleasing
only need to wait for price drop of the m then :D
我暫時都係喜歡CCD 多D
今晚番到酒店上套包噴血A/B比較