BigEyes 發表於 2013-8-13 13:49
my daily lens recently
Dear Ching,請問用version 幾）
gardeneR 發表於 2013-8-13 16:32
Dear Ching,請問用version 幾）
v3 ...
honestly, i can't distinguish different versions without doing A/B test.
{:5_259:}
BigEyes 發表於 2013-8-13 17:24
v3 ...
honestly, i can't distinguish different versions without doing A/B test.
我都覺得分別不大
我真係自己來羅衰！:Q
VVII 發表於 2013-8-8 23:15
50/1.2照片銳度比1.0高很多，反差亦強很多
x2
色水更油潤添
noctilux f1.2
本帖最後由 Skkypole 於 2013-8-13 21:27 編輯
玩Noct當然要尼埋黑媽媽玩嘞。;P
E58 + M9P
等我都貢獻下先 {:4_122:}
容許我都jam番兩張 0.95 + M9P
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7391/9225342836_4ac21ffc85_c.jpg
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2841/9225352028_ba76c138e3_c.jpg
bbcalvin37 發表於 2013-8-13 13:28
有冇d用50luxA 既既勁人介紹下??
noct真係買唔起
Well I'm not 勁人 but I've been using my 50 asph for the longest time before I got my noct.I think they are two very different lens with opposite qualities.The 50 asph is has extremely smooth bokeh and is probably optically better with more corrections etc, it is also a do it all lens really.The 50 noct is more special in that it gives a certain look that goes very well with certain shooting style and application.If I had to choose one and be the end all, I would still choose 50 asph.That being said, I find the noct goes well with my own style for the time being.
In addition, based on what I've seen on the 0.95 noct, it looks very similar to the 50 asph or should I say the 50 asph looks very similar to the 0.95, they share similar bokeh characteristics.
inzite 發表於 2013-8-13 23:01
Well I'm not 勁人 but I've been using my 50 asph for the longest time before I got my noct.I thi ...
想問下：具体來說，是什么style才适合用到Noct啲獨持點呢？謝。
本帖最後由 inzite 於 2013-8-13 23:30 編輯
bubu 發表於 2013-8-13 23:15
想問下：具体來說，是什么style才适合用到Noct啲獨持點呢？謝。
To me it's a very abstract thing sometimes but I guess if one's shooting style (or should I say shooting genre) is more focused on where the noct f1 lacks compared to the 50 asph then the noct would be less ideal for their purpose.For example, from my limited experience, the 50 asph seems to yield better sharpness when stopped down compared to the noct.Also, if one shoots in the 0.7m ~ 1m range alot then the noct might not suit their shooting style as they will have a pain getting used to shooting at least 1m away. Then there is also the physical size difference between them, if I had to go with just 1 body and 1 lens for a super long trip where there are many unknowns, I might opt for the 50 asph rather than the noct.
Another point I want to raise is which lens is more practical.One also needs to keep in mind the long focus throw of the noctilux which might not be the most ideal tool for tracking subjects.I think I'm decent in focusing an RF and even I find tracking focus with a noctilux is rather tedious.
Then again, I'm rather new to RF and M, so I think other better chings should chime in as well.
inzite 發表於 2013-8-13 23:23
To me it's a very abstract thing sometimes but I guess if one's shooting style (or should I say sh ...
Thanks for enlighting.:victory::handshake
本帖最後由 SS.LEICA 於 2013-8-16 08:57 編輯
noctilux 日頭 , 都得㗎 :好油潤 , 色彩討好
noct
SS.LEICA 發表於 2013-8-16 08:54
noctilux 日頭 , 都得㗎 :好油潤 , 色彩討好
noctilux 日頭? VM or MS ?{:8_165:}
gardeneR 發表於 2013-8-16 09:07
noctilux 日頭? VM or MS ?
ektar 100by noctilux 50 1.2
SS.LEICA 發表於 2013-8-16 08:54
noctilux 日頭 , 都得㗎 :好油潤 , 色彩討好
1.2 好靓呀，師兄有冇其他Noct，做下A/B/C/D/E test 呀。
本帖最後由 SS.LEICA 於 2013-8-16 10:23 編輯
lc7535 發表於 2013-8-16 10:08
1.2 好靓呀，師兄有冇其他Noct，做下A/B/C/D/E test 呀。
已有前輩,先進做過啦 !
上網䏲睇啦!哈哈 , 相信你自己有了答案......{:4_105:}
thank you
本帖最後由 ghost03032008 於 2013-8-17 13:45 編輯
bubu 發表於 2013-8-13 23:15
想問下：具体來說，是什么style才适合用到Noct啲獨持點呢？謝。
我就簡單D，用noc, 我喜歡既style 係暗環境，或者係弱光下，又未必一定係夜晚...... 貢，Noc既味道就必哂出尼....
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3665/9526205721_f206a90603_b.jpg
Flickr 上 Ghost03032008 的 L1000901
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3739/9227415025_410ae00836_b.jpg
Flickr 上 Ghost03032008 的 L1009215