ghost03032008
發表於 2013-8-8 23:54:05
inzite 發表於 2013-8-8 23:47
haha i find the noctilux quite smooth and not that hard to use really as some people make it out t ...
我係HM 度偷師,用noc, 有時遠少少去影,效果好似重好.....前景,背景散但又吾會太模糊,個主題又夠突出,又夠立體...
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7397/9273252125_a753602337_b.jpg
Flickr 上 Ghost03032008 的 L1009289
jacky1980
發表於 2013-8-8 23:55:27
ghost03032008 發表於 2013-8-8 23:42
哦.....inzite hing, 你又落毒......jacky hing, 睇怕你今次都劫數難逃咯....
Block 左個網先
ghost03032008
發表於 2013-8-8 23:58:57
jacky1980 發表於 2013-8-8 23:55
Block 左個網先
jacky hing, 放心,尼到好多熱心人仕,你block 左尼次,避吾到第二次架...{:4_118:}
青木Devon
發表於 2013-8-9 00:01:20
Noctilux 50在全開有一種好野性嘅旋轉Bokeh.(當然要適當距離){:5_216:}
Noctilux 50/1 asph Bokeh就無咁容易chok到.光源散景就粒粒分明.
inzite
發表於 2013-8-9 00:04:46
ghost03032008 發表於 2013-8-8 23:54
我係HM 度偷師,用noc, 有時遠少少去影,效果好似重好.....前景,背景散但又吾會太模糊,個主題又夠突出 ...
haha good example, i agree as well.
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5480/9338065581_79018d3d2c_c.jpg
L1003967 by inzite, on Flickr
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3720/9340463042_c90d71e58a_c.jpg
L1003951 by inzite, on Flickr
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3799/9235761420_a3c9cc7d74_c.jpg
L1003727 by inzite, on Flickr
inzite
發表於 2013-8-9 00:05:35
edwardkwong 發表於 2013-8-8 23:53
Noct 真係一個心結, 成日同自已講Lux 夠用架啦
hehe my struggle was the 1M minimum focus distance, but it turns out it's enough for most cases.
ghost03032008
發表於 2013-8-9 00:06:52
inzite 發表於 2013-8-9 00:04
haha good example, i agree as well.
冇錯喇,就係尼個效果喇....特別係第三張...
inzite
發表於 2013-8-9 00:10:12
ghost03032008 發表於 2013-8-9 00:06
冇錯喇,就係尼個效果喇....特別係第三張...
yes yes and that is why 1M min focus distance becomes less of a problem, because you would most likely be shooting further away than that for that specific look that no other lens can do.
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3819/9088422123_3711f9f028_c.jpg
L1003483 by inzite, on Flickr
ghost03032008
發表於 2013-8-9 00:11:24
inzite 發表於 2013-8-9 00:10
yes yes and that is why 1M min focus distance becomes less of a problem, because you would most li ...
yes...agree...using Noc... I usually shoot at3m away....
ic112
發表於 2013-8-9 00:31:25
我得三支,未夠一set............
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3744/9464452151_e703c968c9_c.jpg
Flickr 上 ic112 的未命名相片
ghost03032008
發表於 2013-8-9 00:32:29
ic112 發表於 2013-8-9 00:31
我得三支,未夠一set............
Flickr 上 ic112 的未命名相片
福,祿,壽.....正{:4_134:}
ic112
發表於 2013-8-9 00:33:44
VVII 發表於 2013-8-8 22:48
差好遠下,2/3代基本無咩人喜歡,平幾差野!50/1.2就另論,味道同1.0完全不相同。
其實V2, V3跟本一樣嘢黎.......,平過v4就得啦。
Superhorse
發表於 2013-8-9 00:35:49
都有D代替品的, 止住血先.
有時又唔可以單靠枝鏡既.
inzite
發表於 2013-8-9 00:35:56
ic112 發表於 2013-8-9 00:33
其實V2, V3跟本一樣嘢黎.......,平過v4就得啦。
exactly.:)
ghost03032008
發表於 2013-8-9 00:37:33
Superhorse 發表於 2013-8-9 00:35
都有D代替品的, 止住血先.
有時又唔可以單靠枝鏡既.
唉....超馬兄,你又引我....支0.95.....
Superhorse
發表於 2013-8-9 00:39:59
ghost03032008 發表於 2013-8-9 00:37
唉....超馬兄,你又引我....支0.95.....
依枝好平下, 一定唔過二萬. 粗用唔怕花.:lol
ic112
發表於 2013-8-9 00:40:58
Superhorse 發表於 2013-8-9 00:39
依枝好平下, 一定唔過二萬. 粗用唔怕花.
2皮我要konica 50mm f/1.2.............
kgv
發表於 2013-8-9 00:43:17
Konica 50/1.2 未有耐 先到兩皮 wor
Superhorse
發表於 2013-8-9 00:43:34
ic112 發表於 2013-8-9 00:40
2皮我要konica 50mm f/1.2.............
Konica 50 F1.2 我都有, 完全唔同感覺. 差不多等於 35 F1.4 pra A 對比 35 F1.3 ASPH 的成像感覺.
ic112
發表於 2013-8-9 00:54:10
kgv 發表於 2013-8-9 00:43
Konica 50/1.2 未有耐 先到兩皮 wor
之前想找,個個offer都要$18k或以上wor......
頁:
1
2
[3]
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12