相差好少, 唔係AB, 真係鬼知咩
Support!
上面的菲林相是我們幾年前拍下的reference，未來我們會再用數碼拍輯A﹠B比較，因為我們相信用數碼會比負片更加能夠看到兩者的分別。
wesley 發表於 2013-9-10 12:05
相差好少, 唔係AB, 真係鬼知咩
數碼上兩者差距較大。
I refer to the rendition of red and green in the wide shots of the temple.
V1's color is solid than V2's.
感覺V2 more 3D
Many thanks.
Can see the differences (mainly color and bekeh) even on film and after compressed here. I believe the differences on digital will be more.
一用數碼, 兩者無論銳度, 散景, 明顯大不同！
By V1 @f/1.4
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3772/9720543499_d3d1be6c3b_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 L1000872
By V2 @f/1.4
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5453/9720544901_41cd5d7461_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 L1000878
By V1 @f/1.4
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3832/9723770174_669c331d61_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 By V1
By V2 @f/1.4
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3698/9723768734_086119c664_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 By V2
By V1 @f/4
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7403/9723776032_e1904c13d3_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 L1000882
By V2 @f/4
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7409/9720546469_217cb7f652_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 L1000881
本帖最後由 Pandachief 於 2013-9-11 16:24 編輯
V2 is probably one of the first modern lens design from Leica. It have better contrast and sharpness.
V1 is more Leica signature, glow glow glow!!! Very similar to Summarit! Also with circular bokeh too!
Pandachief 發表於 2013-9-11 16:19
V2 is probably one of the modern lens design from Leica. It have better contrast and sharpness.
V1...
{:4_133:}
V1 similar to Summarit，一矢中的！！
我們都做左個V1 and Summarit比較，下星期預告！{:4_112:}
I always think the Summilux V1 is poor man's Noct 1.2.Noct 1.2 is a super V1 Lux... shallower DOF, more vivid colour and higher contrast. But the character is similar.
{:4_134:}{:4_134:}
試睇睇兩者係f/4下去既銳度分別
Crop of last pictures:
By V1
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5474/9720832321_42ce80d04d_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 L1000882
By V2
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7398/9724121082_8310e7fb1e_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 L1000881
{:4_91:}
Wide open f/1.4 crop
By V1
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7288/9724130936_dc0da370e7_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 By V1
By V2
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3716/9720912013_540a1224f3_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 By V2
睇完呢張大家一向擁V1既有冇動搖?
再另一組比較:
By V1
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5330/9720980607_47ba137b31_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 L1000872
By V2
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2894/9724228192_1b9c5a3047_b.jpg
Flickr 上 RangefinderNotDead 的 L1000878
V2 好吸引
本帖最後由 C9.99 於 2013-9-11 21:50 編輯
ashleyln 發表於 2013-9-10 11:44
v2好似現代少少...同埋好似v1相對黃一點.
但v1散景好似實少少甘GE?
唔知係唔係公司mon影響 ...
原來真係, 無論菲林同數碼, V1真係偏黃點(暖？), 不関個體差異問題, 事関上一組菲林比較係成四年前做, M240數碼係今日影, 四支鏡都不同.
By the way, 今日出勤比較大家都有用UV, 冇hood, V1為常見的紫藍coating, V2亦是常見的紫金coating, V2見過有濃濃的黃金coating, 很濃像是深不見底的, 近年已不常出現於市場, 經驗此濃金coating版本很易出現離膠現象. 我們或會於未來進行AB比較。
C9.99 發表於 2013-9-11 18:01
原來真係, 無論菲林同數碼, V1真係偏黃點(暖？), 不関個體差異問題, 事関上一組菲林比較係成四年前做, M24 ...
想請教下，離膠影響大嗎?
花輪 發表於 2013-9-11 18:29
想請教下，離膠影響大嗎?
一般邊緣或點狀離膠問題不大, 除非離左一大片