C9.99 發表於 2013-8-17 23:39:03

(遅來的少少用後感) 自己試用M240與M9, 看CCD與CMOS直...

本帖最後由 C9.99 於 2013-8-30 14:36 編輯

今日借了部M240, 準備明天出門與M9作一個A/B直出jpeg比較, 夜晚忍唔住偷打了幾張, 發覺心情跟隨顏色一起暗唖左, 好一支八枚玉, 但d色出到.....
iso係強左好多, 下面兩張用iso1000都不覺有明顯噪點, auto白平衡好準, 但顏色, 好似我幾年前買過一部5D2用來試Contax CY及M42鏡..當年5D2用左廿日不到放左出去, 受不住jpeg直出那種暗唖, 自己用左幾年M9, 一比就比到分別...
個放大掣好好用, 但感覺到部機重/墜過M9好多...
試左幾張, 冇哂心情, 唔想帶出trip, 淨係想帶X2輕鬆d, 但又講好左, 唯有頂硬上....希望日光相不太差!


http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3773/9529373191_3a616d8d80_b.jpg
image by RangefinderNotDead, on Flickr



http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7307/9529373409_cf111bb02e_b.jpg
image by RangefinderNotDead, on Flickr









basschan 發表於 2013-8-17 23:44:49

咁即係?{:7_138:}{:7_138:}{:7_138:}

bubu 發表於 2013-8-17 23:58:51

擔定櫈仔。

edchau 發表於 2013-8-18 00:09:32

Waiting............

ghost03032008 發表於 2013-8-18 00:18:42

買定花生等睇戲.......

Patrick_c 發表於 2013-8-18 00:21:26

awaiting:kiss:

edwardyung 發表於 2013-8-18 00:26:52

{:6_311:}{:6_311:}

bytfung 發表於 2013-8-18 00:37:17

睇睇下就慣的了。

bullseye 發表於 2013-8-18 01:01:09

而家要秒秒「步」住呢度{:5_246:}

Jason 發表於 2013-8-18 01:03:53

點解報紙檔張相d highlight 爆晒嘅? :funk:

C9.99 發表於 2013-8-18 01:04:13

bullseye 發表於 2013-8-18 01:01
而家要秒秒「步」住呢度

明晚十一時正式上一批與M9的A/B比較

C9.99 發表於 2013-8-18 01:07:27

Jason 發表於 2013-8-18 01:03
點解報紙檔張相d highlight 爆晒嘅?

用A mode咋

Jason 發表於 2013-8-18 01:13:39

C9.99 發表於 2013-8-18 01:07
用A mode咋

但測光都算係準架喎,好似dynamic range唔係好夠咁,等睇A/B test!! :D

adrian01 發表於 2013-8-18 01:51:01

霸定位等睇師兄share

lambo 發表於 2013-8-18 02:10:32

looking forward to the analysis.....

迦南 發表於 2013-8-18 02:16:47

{:4_134:}

jacky1980 發表於 2013-8-18 07:44:23

解毒解毒:lol

Jason 發表於 2013-8-18 12:22:33

依我見網上圖片,我諗M240 同其他cmos機一樣,後製係非常緊要。
不過我估,直出JPEG而又有CCD嘅色,可以唔洗諗。要睇埋Ming啲sample及JPEG測試再作結論。

m9player 發表於 2013-8-18 12:32:01

驟眼望第一張相光管位好爆,呢D環境好似M9處理得好DD。

grandetech 發表於 2013-8-18 12:57:01

本帖最後由 grandetech 於 2013-8-18 13:04 編輯

m9player 發表於 2013-8-18 12:32
驟眼望第一張相光管位好爆,呢D環境好似M9處理得好DD。
IMHO, I am not a big fan of M240 yet, but to be fair, I don't think one shall judge a camera's dynamic range or quality of colour expression by its out of camera jpeg, the true dynamic range in fact lying under its RAW file for ANY high end digital cameras.After all, I will not buy any expensive digital cam for its jpeg quality.

Forgive me to say, all digital files are meant to be post processed in order to bring out its best.If you ask "so why the hack they still give you OOCJ?", well, simply because there are people either like fast food, no sense of picture quality, no time for PP, and of course, no skill/knowledge for doing good PP.

So testing its jpeg to judge one camera's ability, is not making any sense to me.

Oh, btw, if OP shoots RAW, the overexpose neon light area of the 1st picture, I am pretty sure he can bring the detail back by taming the highlights in LR easily, given M240 RAW ability has 3-4 stops shadows area and 1-2 stops highlights (unofficially and no reference based speaking).


Just my 2 cents.   (I do thank OP for doing the job and sharing with us, it will be fun to me too, whether its a good reference is a question, but its just to me)
頁: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
查看完整版本: (遅來的少少用後感) 自己試用M240與M9, 看CCD與CMOS直...