kgv 發表於 2016-11-15 16:11:40

有 幾多 疑點 ?

網上 勁傳 這張 "claim to be real" shoot of the supermoon ....

Any comment?

MYM8 發表於 2016-11-15 16:19:55

my guess, most are photo shopped
{:5_259:}

nightscrawler 發表於 2016-11-15 17:33:35

要影到咁, 係咪要用5000mm 鏡頭先影到咁大既月亮, 哈哈~

Summilux 發表於 2016-11-15 18:04:55

看resolution 是奇差

可能是50mm 鏡頭,之後crop 100倍:lol

tok 發表於 2016-11-15 19:51:02

Summilux 發表於 2016-11-15 18:04
看resolution 是奇差

可能是50mm 鏡頭,之後crop 100倍

對,通常係咁影,800mm影遠方景物+月亮再Crop就會咁

edwardyung 發表於 2016-11-15 21:56:14

感覺有2種不同的透視。

kgv 發表於 2016-11-15 23:10:24

I just use common sense ... correct me if I am wrong
This is claimed to be taken at 3:30am
Although Tibet is officially of same time zone as HK, geographically this place is close to Nepal.
That means 2.5 hours later than us.
That is to say, around 1am, can the location of full moon be that low ???

Also, they claims that there was glimpse of morning sun, that is lighting up some of the places ...
Glimpse of morning sun at around 1am ???

For photo technical details I leave to you guys experts here :)

*****************************************************************

This was sent to me twice, from highly educated professionals, who are also interested in photography.
Surprisingly, they apparently accept this to be real ...... without question ;P

Talk about independent thinking ...... of highly educated professionals ......
Next time you see a doctor, or lawyer, would you fully accept their opiniopns and advices, without thinking over it thoroughly by yourself ??? ;P

Chinese-Tee 發表於 2016-11-16 00:47:46

攝影話無PS過的,以135mm format計, 要1600mm 就可以將月亮影爆畫面,攝影師話用800mm加2倍增距鏡。另外因爲大氣層關係,一般在海拔低的地方都喺影到咁上下差嘅月亮,而且對焦點在前景,就算用f64,月亮一定out fo的。

redrede 發表於 2016-11-16 06:44:27

唔好玩啦,月亮key落去但色彩暗位唔自然,我望月亮時似600火light blub多D

photo-er 發表於 2016-11-16 09:28:15

PS made photo

chimray 發表於 2016-11-16 13:22:55

呢度係崗仁波齊 !
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 有 幾多 疑點 ?