bubu 發表於 2015-9-14 19:17
暗位old is better, IMHO.
會否內置設定iso推底咗
holmes 發表於 2015-9-14 21:37
請教如何分辨部機CCD係新或舊?
事緣我地一直有俾機德國Leica直接換CCD, 亦都幫過呢度幾個資深會員換，一向都係大約六星期攪掂，但呢次要既時間明顯多左一倍，所以我哋就問一問佢點解要咁耐，回覆返嚟就係準備緊更換一批新型既CCD。
redrede 發表於 2015-9-14 22:36
會否內置設定iso推底咗
但暗位似乎冇乜暗到，就算有，個比例似乎冇光位細節咁明顯。
Group B
暗位crop！
good wor, micro-contrast is also higher ...BTW, same firmware??
睇泥我部M9P可以一路keep 落去鳥{:2_31:}
本帖最後由 0.95 於 2015-9-16 02:35 編輯
我用屋企部Cal咗mon嘅電腦睇，Group B兩張相，中間 “通渠” 兩個字嗰塊牆嘅color rendition有較明顯嘅分別。
1. Color rendition：
Old CCD個色水，似返一貫CCD嘅感覺，偏黃又帶少少綠，感覺實淨啲豐富啲；而New CCD個色水，中性啲又有少少輕微偏紅，感覺單薄啲啲。
2. Contrast：
感覺上，New CCD個contrast低少少
3. Dynamic Range：
New CCD個光暗位details係好少少。
當然，以上嘅分別只係好subtle，我諗唔係A B side咁比較，或者喺LR PS fine tune下，兩者分別唔會好明顯。慶幸嘅，係New CCD個色水同相片質感並無走向CMOS化。
不過，既然Leica聲稱New CCD永無甩coat，加上Leica仲肯俾啲力水去搞部M9，足以證明M9真係仲有排玩！
話唔定，M9(P)個市場會有所反彈～有心買嘅用家，有買襯手！有心放嘅用家，睇定啲先～
Group C
doesn't look like much major diff, new ccd looks lower contrast yielding a wider DR look.I have a minor coating flaw issue on my ccd.. :/
Group C Crop!
good sharing and thank you Ming哥!!!{:4_134:}
Thanks very much Ming Gor for sharing!
New CCD seems to have lower contrast and higher dynamic range. Agree with c-hings above on this point.
Even though old CCD has a familiar look, I prefer the new one! Look forward to changing my Monochrom CCD!
本帖最後由 C9.99 於 2015-9-16 13:54 編輯
Group D
Group D Crop!
{:5_268:}
正呀{:5_268:} my M9-P can be kept long
I'll keep my M9P too...:)
Group E
OLD CCD
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/614/20784896574_aba903fefc_b.jpg
L9998551 (Old) by Rangefinder notDead, 於 Flickr
NEW CCD
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/766/21219757118_b8db9fb249_b.jpg
L9990034 (New) by Rangefinder notDead, 於 Flickr
Group E Crop!
OLD CCD
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/691/21490267761_47ab0dc594_b.jpg
L9998551 (Old) by Rangefinder notDead, 於 Flickr
NEW CCD
https://farm1.staticflickr.com/571/21294772159_6d73cef8a1_b.jpg
L9990034 (New) by Rangefinder notDead, 於 Flickr