M8.2 or A7II
Really hard to do final decision made, M8.2 or A7II. Please kind adviceIf you consider reliability, go for Sony A series. 如果買M8.2，要有除時用唔到既心情
如果講質素，那就冇什麼好比
另外A7 II 係FF a7ii, far more versatile. Considering repairing and no short supply of parts for M8/8.2, M240 is another good choice too . :) 曾經想過A7R，除像素高外，價格也要考慮。我不是石膏手，所以A7II列入考慮名單. M8.2純粹追求血統，機、鏡Lecia製的。 本帖最後由 4466 於 2015-4-20 11:22 編輯
M鏡駁Sony機身adaptor那牌子比較好？ 一定系Sony AFII~~~
Adaptor 可以買福仔marco果隻 本帖最後由 vincecharus 於 2015-5-12 18:48 編輯
I would not say anything absolutely.In some circumstances, M8.2 might give better images than A7II.
M8.2 has an APS-H cropped CCD sensor.The IR filter in front of the M8.2 sensor (Kodak KAF-10500 CCD, now discontinued) is only 0.5mm thick.While it is not 100% effective in blocking IR light, sometimes resulting in purple casts in what should be pitch black in an image, it has 2 advantages: (1) it gives wide-angle and superwide-angle lenses better performances, as the main cause of purple edges and decreased image quality towards the edges is due to the IR glass filter in front of the sensor; and (2) more sensitivity in the shadows.When Leica ventured into digital, these were the engineering trade offs for maintaining the performances of Leica wide angles on its first digital camera, M8.If you are interested in IR photos taken with the M8, look at 18x24 c-hing's thread.
Because of the APS-H cropped sensor of the M8.2, an image taken by the camera is equivalent to the central 77% of the area of an image taken by a camera with a FF sensor.If you look at the MTF curves of most lenses, the edges of an image is likely where a lens performs worst.M8.2 automatically cuts out the edges where a lens is unlikely to perform as well as in the center.This is one of the reasons why experienced users of M8 and M8.2 often say they produce even better images than M9.
While Sony A7II is a modern, versatile camera that has superior high ISO performance, its 1mm IR glass filter in front of its FF sensor means most Leica wide angles and superwide angles do not perform optimally on it.Used together with M-mount wide angles or superwide angles, you are likely to find that the image quality deteriorates towards the edges, sometimes very significantly.(Modern lenses such as the new ZM 35/1.4 and Voigtlander 15/4.5 III might be exceptions.)
I would say M8.2 has the following advantages:
- CCD sensor
- 0.5mm IR cut filter in front of the sensor
- optimal performance of most M-mount wide angle and superwide angle lenses
A7II has the following advantages:
- full frame
- latest technology and modern design
- great high ISO performance
- live view
- autofocus
- ability to use any lens, not just M-mount lenses
- repair and maintenance not likely to be an issue
For a practical photographer, A7II would be the choice.
For someone who loves Leica, CCD, and is looking for optimal performance in wide angle or superwide angle M-lenses (and the option to do IR photography) under low ISO, M8 or M8.2 would be the choice.
A7II + 福仔macro adapter {:5_268:} 我都比較過A7同Vario， 結果因為價錢同FF, 選擇了A7.
大家又點睇M9 或 A7 II? 差ㄧ皮左右價錢咋
{:4_118:} redrede 發表於 2015-4-27 07:13
大家又點睇M9 或 A7 II? 差ㄧ皮左右價錢咋
如果單計畫質，個人覺得 M9 都未出到 M8/8.2 的 brilliance :( 本帖最後由 4466 於 2015-5-9 13:54 編輯
剛才在MK同某大連鎖店店員吹水，佢話店內A7R已經售馨，亦不會入貨。我話非莫有新嘢？店員笑而不答。 4466 發表於 2015-5-8 23:17
剛才在MK同某大連鎖店店員吹水，佢話店內A7R已經售馨，亦不會入貨。我話非莫有新嘢？員工笑而不答。 ...
A7r ii 無意思, a7s ii 先有用啫 頭文字L 發表於 2015-4-27 13:06
如果單計畫質，個人覺得 M9 都未出到 M8/8.2 的 brilliance
I share the same view !! MP101 發表於 2015-5-11 21:29
I share the same view !!
如果M8/8.2，個人覺得最好用係28mm，家陣用支sum micron.... 但支 28/1.4 量產型又唔出，唉。。。:( 呢個 配搭 真喺 未試過
有咩咁好玩呀？
kgv 發表於 2015-5-12 18:47
呢個 配搭 真喺 未試過
有咩咁好玩呀？
太正了吧！！ kgv 發表於 2015-5-12 18:47
呢個 配搭 真喺 未試過
有咩咁好玩呀？
你晚晚後宮三千，玩到冇乜特別feel。係正常嘅。
頁:
[1]
2